How to Create a Stakeholder Map for Seamless Project Tracking
Six years ago, I led a website content overhaul that nearly derailed when the product team and sales department had completely different ideas about our messaging priorities.
Despite my experience with content strategies, I made a rookie mistake — I hadn’t created a stakeholder map. That experience pushed me to develop a systematic approach to stakeholder management.
Now, as a content strategist who’s guided content projects for over 30 SaaS companies, I’ve seen how the right stakeholder strategy can transform scattered feedback into a clear direction.
Table of Contents
What is a stakeholder map?
A stakeholder map is a visual document that plots out everyone who has influence over or is affected by your project. It shows who needs to be involved, how much influence they have, and how their priorities connect.
What makes it powerful is that it forces you to step back and see the whole picture. You document each stakeholder’s role, their level of influence, what they care about most, and how they prefer to communicate.
The map becomes your guide for managing expectations and preventing conflicts before they happen.
For example, when I create content strategies for SaaS companies, my stakeholder map typically includes product managers (who know the technical details), sales teams (who talk to customers daily), and executives (who hold the vision) — each bringing different needs to the table.
Stakeholder Map Example
Let me share a real stakeholder map I created for a recent SaaS website revamp project.
The map organized the different types of stakeholders into three key circles of influence:
circle of influence | types of stakeholders |
Core Decision Makers |
|
Key Influencers |
|
Supporting Contributors |
|
For each person, I noted their primary concerns:
- The VP of Marketing focused on market positioning and ROI metrics.
- The Sales Director cared most about having strong customer case studies.
- The Product Manager needed technical accuracy in feature descriptions.
This map helped me prioritize feedback and plan my communication strategy. When conflicting opinions arose about messaging priorities, I could refer back to each stakeholder’s core concerns to find common ground.
How to Create a Stakeholder Map
Understanding and identifying your key stakeholders is critical when launching new initiatives or making changes. It ensures smoother implementation and reduces resistance. Here are six steps to create a stakeholder map.
1. Identify and list all potential stakeholders.
Start with a comprehensive brain dump of everyone who might influence or be affected by your project.
As Menaka Gopinath, Chief Marketing Officer at Project Management Institute (PMI), explains:
“Critical is understanding who is going to be most impacted by the outcome, who is going to guide how you drive the outcome, and who you have to rely on to deliver the outcome.
“This helps guide where you can avoid unnecessary barriers — a lot of times, there is a cohort of people who just want to know what’s happening, even if they don’t play a critical role in delivering. Proactive communication at cadenced times can help avoid meddling that can take you off track.”
I include obvious stakeholders like direct supervisors and team members. But I also think broader and consider compliance teams who need to review deliverables, external partners who provide resources, and end users who will be impacted by the project outcomes.
Create a master list organized by department or function. For each stakeholder, note their role and potential contribution to the project. Look beyond formal titles — sometimes, a junior team member might have crucial institutional knowledge that makes them a key stakeholder.
Consider both direct and indirect stakeholders. Direct stakeholders actively participate in the project, while indirect stakeholders feel its effects without direct involvement.
For example, your IT team might not attend project meetings, but they’re crucial stakeholders if your project requires technical implementation.
2. Assess power and interest levels.
Once you’ve identified your stakeholders, evaluate each one based on two key factors: their power (ability to influence the project) and their interest (how much they care about the outcomes). This assessment helps you determine how to manage each relationship effectively.
Create a simple grid with power on the vertical axis and interest on the horizontal axis. This visualization helps you place each stakeholder into one of four categories:
As Gopinath notes, “At PMI, there is a great deal of learning available to guide stakeholder management. The Stakeholder Salience Framework prioritizes stakeholder engagement based on three attributes — Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency. The more attributes a stakeholder possesses, the greater priority you would put to engaging this stakeholder.”
3. Define communication preferences and needs.
Understanding how each stakeholder prefers to receive information is just as important as knowing what to communicate. Some stakeholders want detailed weekly reports, while others need only high-level monthly updates.
Document these preferences in your stakeholder map, noting:
- Communication channels (email, meetings, project management tools).
- Frequency of updates (daily, weekly, monthly).
- Level of detail (executive summaries versus full reports).
- Format preferences (visual presentations versus written documentation).
Many teams successfully use project management or CRM systems to track and manage these communication preferences systematically. This approach ensures everyone on your team knows how to engage with different stakeholders effectively.
According to Iqbal Ahmad, Founder of the Britannia School of Academics, this systematic tracking is crucial:
“We make sure that we have a clearly defined Stakeholders Map on our CRM that every member of our management and leadership team can see. This helps us in ensuring that priorities are set accordingly for each and every stakeholder.
“Similarly, if we are launching a new project, we make sure to have a specific stakeholder map for that project so that directed and specific project-related efforts can be made to ensure maximum stakeholder engagement.”
Preferences might change throughout the project lifecycle. Check in periodically to ensure your communication approach still serves everyone’s needs.
4. Plot internal vs. external dependencies.
Every project operates within a web of internal and external relationships that need careful management. Start by creating two lists of dependencies that could impact your project’s success.
Internal Dependencies | External Dependencies |
|
|
As Sidharth Ramsinghaney, Director of Strategy and Operations at Twilio, explains, “Though corporate functions like IT security and finance remain constant, their relative influence and engagement levels shift. Starting with a clean slate for stakeholder mapping, coupled with a robust RACI framework and clear executive sponsorship structure, has proven crucial for project success.”
I recommend mapping these relationships in terms of their sequencing — which approvals or inputs need to come first?
For example, you might need legal approval before external vendor engagement or customer feedback before internal development can proceed.
Remember that dependencies aren’t just about approvals. Consider knowledge dependencies too — who holds crucial information your project needs? Document these information flows to prevent bottlenecks later.
5. Build feedback loops.
Regular feedback from stakeholders shouldn’t feel like pulling teeth.
I’ve found creating systematic ways to gather input helps you spot potential issues before they become problems and keeps everyone aligned with your project’s direction.
Digital analytics provide a quiet but powerful feedback channel. Track how stakeholders interact with your shared documents, which sections they comment on most, and where confusion typically arises. These patterns reveal more than what people might say in meetings.
Set up multiple channels for feedback based on stakeholder preferences. Some might prefer quick voice messages, while others give their best input through collaborative documents. The key is making feedback feel natural rather than forced.
Iqbal Ahmad shares, “To gather stakeholder information beyond traditional interviews and surveys, we have implemented innovative techniques tailored to the unique business environment in which we operate.
“One effective approach is leveraging data analytics to track real-time behaviors, such as engagement, completion rates, and feedback patterns. Another technique is using sentiment analysis on communication platforms like emails and social media. This provided a clearer understanding of stakeholder concerns and preferences without requiring extensive feedback sessions.”
Create regular checkpoints where stakeholders can raise concerns or share wins. But remember — not every stakeholder needs to weigh in on every decision. Be strategic about whose feedback you seek and when.
6. Plan for conflict resolution.
Stakeholder conflicts are inevitable, especially when multiple departments have different priorities for the same project. The key is having a clear system for resolving them before they derail your timeline.
I suggest creating a decision matrix that weighs each stakeholder’s input based on their role in the project. When the sales team wants more product features highlighted but the design team pushes for a cleaner layout, you’ll have a framework for prioritizing these competing needs.
Document how previous conflicts were successfully resolved. This builds an internal playbook you can reference when similar situations arise. Often, past solutions can be adapted for current challenges.
Ahmad explains how a prioritization framework and using other factors helps with this:
“We rely on a prioritization framework that evaluates stakeholders beyond the two traditional factors of interest and influence — by attempting to devise tactical solutions that meet the varying and competing expectations of stakeholders across different groups.
“For example, when student feedback demanded more flexible learning while our awarding organizations emphasized stricter compliance checks, we prioritized addressing both by designing stricter assessment and quality assurance checks to meet the expectations of both.
“Transparency and communication are key to managing such conflicts. We actively involve stakeholders in the resolution process, often through feedback loops or collaborative meetings.”
When conflicts arise, I prefer to focus discussions on project objectives rather than individual preferences. I find this shifts conversations from personal opinions to measurable outcomes that benefit the project.
Stakeholder Map Template
Starting with a tested template saves you from building your stakeholder map from scratch — and helps ensure you don’t miss critical relationships that could impact your project’s success.
HubSpot offers a stakeholder map template that makes this process simpler.
Download HubSpot’s free stakeholder map template now.
Use it to:
- Track both internal stakeholders (like product teams and subject matter experts) and external ones (like clients and industry partners).
- Document each stakeholder’s potential impact on project timelines and outcomes.
- Plan communication strategies for different stakeholder groups.
Classify stakeholders, understand their potential contributions or roadblocks, and improve communication with everyone from investors to interest groups involved in your projects.
Start Building Your Stakeholder Strategy
Creating a stakeholder map might seem like extra work when you’re eager to dive into your project. But I’ve learned that this upfront investment pays dividends throughout the project lifecycle.
Start small — map out your next content project using the template and guidelines above. Pay attention to how relationships evolve and which communication approaches work best. Your first map won’t be perfect, and that’s okay.
Also, stakeholder mapping isn’t a one-time exercise. Let your map grow as you gain new insights about your stakeholders’ needs and priorities.